Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Vasc Bras ; 22: e20220098, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37790890

RESUMEN

Background: Infection is the most frequent complication of central venous catheters used for hemodialysis. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to the determine the central venous catheter-related infection rate at a dialysis center in the Brazilian state of Amazonas and to identify risk factors and the microbiological profile of the infections. Methods: This was an observational study with prospective data collection over a 12-month period by chart analysis and face-to-face interviews with patients undergoing hemodialysis using central venous catheters at a dialysis center. Results: 96 central venous catheters were analyzed in 48 patients. 78 of these were non-tunneled central venous catheters (81.3%) and 18 were tunneled central venous catheters (18.7%), 53.1% of the catheters were exchanged because of infection and blood cultures were obtained from 35.2% of the patients who had catheter-related infections. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from five of the nine blood cultures in which there was bacterial growth and Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from the other four. The most commonly isolated bacteria was Staphylococcus hominis, found in 22.2% of positive blood cultures. Conclusion: The overall hemodialysis venous catheter infection rate was 10.1 episodes/1000 catheter days, 15.1 episodes/1000 catheters days in non-tunneled catheters and 3.3 episodes/1000 catheters days in tunneled catheters. The infection predisposing factors identified were use of non-tunneled catheters and having 2 hemodialysis sessions per week. Regarding the microbiological profile, over half of the bacteria isolated were Gram-negative.

2.
J. vasc. bras ; 22: e20220098, 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1448592

RESUMEN

Resumo Contexto Infecção é a complicação mais frequente do uso de cateter venoso central em hemodiálise. Objetivo O propósito do trabalho foi determinar a taxa de incidência de infecções de cateteres venosos centrais para hemodiálise em um centro de diálise no estado do Amazonas, bem como seus fatores preditivos, além de traçar o perfil microbiológico dessas infecções. Métodos Trata-se de um estudo observacional, com dados coletados mensalmente e de forma prospectiva, por meio de entrevista e análise de prontuários de pacientes submetidos a hemodiálise por meio de cateteres venosos centrais em um centro de diálise durante um período de 12 meses. Resultados Foram analisados 96 cateteres venosos centrais, de 48 pacientes. Do total, foram 78 cateteres venosos não tunelizados (81,3%) e 18 cateteres venosos tunelizados (18,7%). Dos cateteres acompanhados, 53,1% foram trocados por motivo de infecção, sendo realizada hemocultura de 35,2% dos pacientes que apresentaram infecção de cateter. Quanto ao perfil microbiológico, das nove hemoculturas positivas, em cinco foram isoladas bactérias gram-negativas, e em quatro foram isoladas bactérias gram-positivas. A bactéria mais frequentemente isolada foi a Staphylococcus hominis, presente em 22,2% das hemoculturas positivas. Conclusão A taxa de incidência global de infecção de cateteres venosos centrais foi de 10,1 episódios por 1.000 dias de cateter, sendo de 15,1 nos cateteres não tunelizados e de 3,3 nos cateteres tunelizados. Os fatores preditivos identificados foram o uso de cateter venoso central não tunelizado e a realização de duas sessões de diálise semanais. Quanto ao perfil microbiológico, pouco mais da metade das bactérias isoladas foram gram-negativas.


Abstract Background Infection is the most frequent complication of central venous catheters used for hemodialysis. Objectives The purpose of this study was to the determine the central venous catheter-related infection rate at a dialysis center in the Brazilian state of Amazonas and to identify risk factors and the microbiological profile of the infections. Methods This was an observational study with prospective data collection over a 12-month period by chart analysis and face-to-face interviews with patients undergoing hemodialysis using central venous catheters at a dialysis center. Results 96 central venous catheters were analyzed in 48 patients. 78 of these were non-tunneled central venous catheters (81.3%) and 18 were tunneled central venous catheters (18.7%), 53.1% of the catheters were exchanged because of infection and blood cultures were obtained from 35.2% of the patients who had catheter-related infections. Gram-negative bacteria were isolated from five of the nine blood cultures in which there was bacterial growth and Gram-positive bacteria were isolated from the other four. The most commonly isolated bacteria was Staphylococcus hominis, found in 22.2% of positive blood cultures. Conclusion The overall hemodialysis venous catheter infection rate was 10.1 episodes/1000 catheter days, 15.1 episodes/1000 catheters days in non-tunneled catheters and 3.3 episodes/1000 catheters days in tunneled catheters. The infection predisposing factors identified were use of non-tunneled catheters and having 2 hemodialysis sessions per week. Regarding the microbiological profile, over half of the bacteria isolated were Gram-negative.

3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 69: 345-351, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32504789

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several studies in the literature report continued proximal aorta and distal iliac artery dilatation after surgical correction of an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). The purpose of this study is to evaluate these findings, in a South American population, and relate them to the type of configuration of the open procedure aortic reconstruction. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of ultrasonographic follow-up of patients submitted to open repair of AAA from 1989 to 2013, reporting proximal aorta dilatation (≥3 cm) and distal iliac artery dilatation (≥1.5 cm). RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were included. Life-table freedom at the intervals 11 < 15 years and ≥15 years were 47% and 23% for proximal dilatation and 63% and 38% for distal iliac arteries dilatation, respectively. There were more proximal and distal dilatations in patients submitted to more extensive aortic reconstructions (aorto-aortic 13% and 22% vs aorto-bilateral common iliacs 27% and 8% vs aorto-unilateral or bilateral external iliacs 27% and 32% and aorto-femoral 67% and 0%) P < 0.0001. Juxtarenal anastomosis was also correlated with more proximal dilatations (42% vs 21%, P = 0,046). There were two proximal and three distal anastomosis pseudoaneurysms. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of more extensive degenerative disease at the time of operation, requiring juxtarenal or more distal iliac reconstructions, may pose an increased risk of proximal aorta and iliac artery dilatation during follow-up. This study corroborates that significant changes are found after 7 to 10 years of the operation, reinforcing the need for long-term monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma Falso/patología , Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Aneurisma de la Aorta/patología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Remodelación Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma Falso/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma Falso/epidemiología , Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Abdominal/patología , Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Brasil/epidemiología , Dilatación Patológica , Femenino , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/patología , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...